![]() Josh Beal, an editor in Hollywood with credits ranging from Bloodline to House of Cards to Counterpart, speaks his mind on why Hollywood should reconsider its view on using FCPX. In the nine years since the application came out many updates have been rolled out and Hollywood’s view has been stuck in 2011. Since Final Cut Pro X (FCPX) came out in April 2011, many have criticized the application saying things like, “it’s iMovie pro” or “Apple has given up on the pros,” etc. Reconsidering Final Cut Pro X in Hollywood Josh did a whole Faster Together presentation on this topic which you can find on this page. In this presentation, Josh explains why Avid Media Composer is the King of the NLE in Hollywood and what needs to happen to convince current Media Composer editors to switch over to Final Cut Pro X. As a TV editor, Josh thinks it is time for Hollywood to reconsider Final Cut Pro X as a viable editing platform. When you choose between Final Cut Pro and iMovie, pick the video editing software that fits your needs, your budget, and your creative flow.Josh Beal is a Hollywood editor who has work on such shows as Counterpart, Bloodline, and House of Cards. Its bank of tools and features, and the overall interface and experience reflects this. On the other hand, iMovie is designed for beginners and those simply looking for an easy-to-use video editor. In terms of features and effects, Final Cut Pro offers a higher degree of detail and customizability, while not sacrificing too much in terms of ease of use and interface. ![]() In the battle between Apple Final Cut Pro vs Apple iMovie, there’s no doubt that FCP is the massively more powerful editing software. When you need to choose between Final Cut Pro and iMovie, pick the video editing software that fits your needs, your budget, and your creative flow. ![]() Its bank of tools and features, and the overall interface and experience reflects this.įor their respective users, both tools excel - although there are other free video editors, such as DaVinci Resolve, that are undeniably more powerful than iMovie. When it comes to Apple Final Cut Pro vs Apple iMovie, there’s no doubt that FCP is the massively more powerful editing software. iMovie vs Final Cut Pro: Performanceįinal Cut Pro features four panels: imported media, editor, timeline, and effects (Image credit: Apple) If you’re cutting a simpler project without complex effects, Apple iMovie should meet your needs. Final Cut Pro also offers a huge bank of preinstalled effects, but allows you to import your own if needed.įinal Cut Pro ticks all the boxes when it comes to features, allowing users to achieve almost any desired outcome. For example, you can exactingly adjust frames using the color inspector tool and keyframes feature. IMovie has all of the features a more basic video project might require, including transitions, sound effects, speed adjustment, and photo overlays.įinal Cut Pro’s roster of VFX far outstrips this, and can be combined in lots of unique ways to achieve stunning results. But, it’s arguably the most intuitive of the professional-level editors available on the market. There’s certainly a steeper learning curve. That’s not to say Final Cut Pro is difficult to use. But it’s fair to say, as iMovie is specifically pitched at those with less video editing experience, it’s the more intuitive of the two programs. That’s no different with Final Cut Pro or iMovie. Whilst editing titles on Final Cut Pro is less intuitive, it allows you to frame, time, and visually alter text in almost any way.Īpple excels at designing software that’s incredibly easy to use. However, iMovie provides few options to subsequently customize these after they have been added to your video. IMovie provides a selection of title presets (Image credit: Apple)īoth iMovie and Final Cut have a large selection of built-in text titles you can select.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |